|
|
Post by The Razor Roman Empire on Oct 3, 2014 17:35:26 GMT
How do you fix the holes on the sinking ship that is TNA? Keep this thing afloat and give us some stuff you would do to fix TNA as a businessman and creative writer!
|
|
|
Jett
|
| Posts: | 156 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 16 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Jett on Oct 3, 2014 21:26:33 GMT
They should stop boosting up their own guys so that they sound amazing. Because when you watch them, they are disapointing.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Razor Roman Empire on Oct 4, 2014 1:57:29 GMT
They should stop boosting up their own guys so that they sound amazing. Because when you watch them, they are disapointing. What do you mean by that? |
|
|
Jett
|
| Posts: | 156 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 16 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Jett on Oct 4, 2014 19:29:56 GMT
Like before some of the wrestlers matches, the commentators talk about them and say stuff like "He is one of the best wrestlers of today", and then you watch it, and you think to yourself, "Wow, what's their definition of a bad wrestler?" It could just be me, but, that is one of the many problems.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Razor Roman Empire on Oct 4, 2014 19:48:59 GMT
Like before some of the wrestlers matches, the commentators talk about them and say stuff like "He is one of the best wrestlers of today", and then you watch it, and you think to yourself, "Wow, what's their definition of a bad wrestler?" It could just be me, but, that is one of the many problems. I don't think that really matters... It's just.. How do you have Havok and Gail Kim, who is injured, as your main event? And they hardly have anything you want to stay tuned into after their main event. WWE's very good about having a little something to hype up an upcoming PPV or something, at the end of the show. TNA doesn't know how to do that, or at least it doesn't seem that way. And whatever happened to Gunner and his push? It ended so quickly. |
|
|
Jett
|
| Posts: | 156 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 16 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Jett on Oct 6, 2014 1:16:38 GMT
But they only have about two or three PPVs that you actually Pay-Per-View. Now they just pick a night that they're going to be on TV anyway, take a PPV name and then they say that it's a "free PPV". I think that the only ones that they make you pay for are Slammiversary and Bound for Glory, other than that you just need to have cable. And Gunner's push didn't last long.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Razor Roman Empire on Oct 6, 2014 3:05:33 GMT
But they only have about two or three PPVs that you actually Pay-Per-View. Now they just pick a night that they're going to be on TV anyway, take a PPV name and then they say that it's a "free PPV". I think that the only ones that they make you pay for are Slammiversary and Bound for Glory, other than that you just need to have cable. And Gunner's push didn't last long. Lockdown too, or at least I think the would. They need to push their guys like Gunner rather than keeping the old and washed ups at the top of the food chain... We never see development. We see people up there immediately, and then they fall off. WWE develops their stars. |
|
|
Jett
|
| Posts: | 156 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 16 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Jett on Oct 6, 2014 21:52:26 GMT
Another reason WWE is better than TNA.
|
|
 |
Joeh!
|
| Posts: | 75 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 1 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Joeh! on Oct 9, 2014 16:59:25 GMT
I haven't watched TNA in like 2 years. LOL
|
|
|
Jett
|
| Posts: | 156 |
| Joined: | January 1970 |
| Likes: | 16 |
| Points: |
|
|
|
Post by Jett on Oct 11, 2014 3:28:23 GMT
You haven't really missed anything.
|
|
